Friday 21 March 2014

Thorium?

Headline in the Guardian today.
"China working on uranium-free nuclear plants in attempt to combat smog Beijing brings forward deadline for world's first thorium-fuelled facility in attempt to break reliance on fossil fuels."

Scientists have known about Thorium for yonks as a potential nuclear fuel, so why is Thorium not the nuclear fuel of choice? It is much more abundant than Uranium, it does not go into meltdown and cause a Chernobyl or a Fukishima, its waste breaks down in a relatively short time, and is much safer all round. But there is one catch. It does not produce weapons grade by-products like plutonium, so no bombs. Can't have that!

Coal: Nature's Hazardous Waste Dump.

7 comments:

  1. wow, I did not know that Stafford!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, and i have heard there is one being built in India too.

      Delete
  2. do you get the feeling the people don't really want to know about nuclear issues Staffo ;)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't know Gabe, but the cold war had its upside, like lots of great spy thrillers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just follow the money! Power and greed go hand in hand!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Heaven forbid, we don't produce more nuclear bombs!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Our tardiness in perfecting Thorium reactors means most of the world will be buying them ready made in China!

      Delete

(leave a message)